I’ve started to mumble about this subject after I’ve read this post, which I have quickly summarized.

According to the original Peter Principle: ”in a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to their level of incompetence”. This means that all the work is done by those who have not yet reached their level of incompetence.

A wider application of this principle emerges from looking at how companies grow in the marketplace and how they innovate and how they “lose their soul” and stop innovating.

Companies innovate until they find a cash cow. At that point, only innovation that supports the cash cow is promoted, while innovation that does not support the cash cow languishes or is actively killed. Eventually, most of the innovation ceases as the innovators leave and start new companies (and the cycle repeats).

PR as an industry has definitely lost the “innovation momentum” a long time ago, when cash cows such as media relations have started to consolidate. Too many people are offering “commoditized” services, which do not - or should not - belong to our profession.

PR should be about research and innovation. Using the same strategy and tacticts - when there is a strategy and there are tactics - to reach audiences wich are different by age, sex, income, culture and skills (and so on) is a total nonsense.

PR should be at the forefront of innovation. PR should be about inventing new ways of relating with people, or perfecting those invented by others, and not about selling “two pounds of press releases and half pound of interviews”.

Too often, this is PR today, at its highest level of incompetence.